Obama’s Membership In The Socialist “New Party”

October 16th, 2008  |  by John Kaduk Published in 2008 Presidential Race, Investigations  |  7 Comments

Yesterday I told you I would delve deeper into  this matter and give you more details.  Here they are.

First off, do not get the New Party we are talking about here confused with the New Party that ran Eugene McCarthy for President in 1968.  They are unrelated.  The New Party was mostly active in the mid 1990’s and was an openly socialist party.  This party was an offshoot of the Democratic Socialists of America or DSA which created and supported the New Party in order to get socialists elected at the local levels which would then hopefully move socialism up the political ladder.  For you liberals who have already yelled that I am lying read this archived 1996 newsletter from the group.  The New Party’s method for getting elected was a process called “fusion” where the candidate combines votes from multiple parties.  In other words, the candidate would be on two ballot lines.  The New Party tactic of fusion was shut down in 1997 by the Supreme Court in the case Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party.   For a better explanation of fusion read this from Red State:

Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate — let’s call him Barack Obama — received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama’sNew Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.
So now we have proven the New Party was a socialist party and explained the tactic of fusion.  Now to Obama.  In 1996 Obama was running for the Illinois State Senate.  He was in the democratic primary against four other people including his biggest opponent Alice Palmer.  Obama did not need the fusion tactic to win the primary since he successfully lobbied to disqualify his other 3 opponents on petition technicalities.  This is common knowledge and nothing new.  Despite not even needing the New Party and their fusion tactic, Obama not only seeked out their endorsement but signed a “Candidate Contract” that explicitly says you must be publicly identified with the group and become a dues paying member.  Still don’t believe me Libs?  Here is the contract he would have had to sign.

So big deal you say, how do we know he was actually a member unless you have his signed copy of the agreement?  There are multiple sources mostly from the archived New Party website.  The newparty.org website is still up but once hints of Barack’s membership started leaking out earlier this year they and the DSA removed all material mentioning Barack Obama.  Not to worry though, there are archives of the New Party website and DSA newsletters that can be easily accessed.

The first piece of evidence comes from the August 1996 DSA newsletter I mentioned earlier.  Simply do a search for Obama and you will come to this:

Secondly, the NP’s’96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude. Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee. Patricia Martin, who won the race for Judge in 7th Subcircuit Court, explained that due to the NP she was able to network and get experienced advice from progressives like Davis. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration.
Not enough for you.  There is another source.  This is an archived page from the New Party website detailing their 1996 political races.  Look to the Illinois section and you come to this, probably the most damning of all the evidence:
Illinois: Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).
Now go to this archived New Party page and you will find this gem where they list all their candidates.
Illinois: Danny Davis (U.S. House of Representatives, 1996, 1998), Miguel Del Valle (Illinois State Senate, 1998), Willie Delgado (Illinois State Legislature, 1998), Barack Obama (State Legislature, 1996), Michael Chandler (Chicago City Council , 1995), , Patricia Martin (Cook County Judge, 1996).
There is so much evidence here that it is impossible any liberal or democrat could defend Barack Obama without needing to be locked away in an insane asylum.  We have proved the New Party was socialist being part of the DSA.  I have shown you the contract Obama would have needed to sign to get their support which explicitly says you must join the group.  And lastly I have shown you three archived web pages that came directly from the DSA and New Party themselves which state that Barack Obama was one of their members.  It is now clear what I have said all along about Barack Obama, he is a socialist.
Sphere: Related Content

Responses

  1. If you're voting for Obama - You MUST be retarded! | The BoBo Files says:

    October 17th, 2008at 11:26 pm(#)

    [...] another post you NEED to read from our good buddy John:  Obama’s Membership in the Socialist Party - this is a follow up post that John put up over at The Right Wing.  And..I thought I was pissed [...]

  2. If you’re voting for Obama - You MUST be retarded! | Driving the Left Loony -The Bobo Files says:

    October 18th, 2008at 12:54 am(#)

    [...] another post you NEED to read from our good buddy John:  Obama’s Membership in the Socialist Party - this is a follow up post that John put up over at The Right Wing.  And..I thought I was pissed [...]

  3. Obama Is A Marxist At Heart :: The Right Wing says:

    October 28th, 2008at 6:27 pm(#)

    [...] Obama was a member of the “New Party” in the mid 1990’s which was started and supported by the Democratic Socialists of America.  Proof can be seen here. [...]

  4. golo3 says:

    October 28th, 2008at 11:48 pm(#)

    Whoever thinks Obama is a socialist is just stupid. If he was a socialist I’d vote for him! Maybe you should look at the definition of socialism first (I recommend Wikipedia) and then think about what Obama proposes….he does not propose to nationalize any industries, not even healthcare which in my opinion SHOULD DEFINITELY be nationalized….he’s just as much for businesses as McCain is. And in regards to taxes….you know what taxes are for….redistribution! Next time you write such an article….do your research!

  5. John Kaduk says:

    October 29th, 2008at 7:07 am(#)

    So was my entire article just a big lie? Did I fabricate all those resources and web pages? You fail to address the evidence mounting against him. Saying “I’m a socialist, Obama isn’t” is not an argument with any substance to it. Wikipedia is not a good source, practically anyone can go in and edit anything they want, nevermind its run by a bunch of libs.

    He would effectively nationalize healthcare. He won’t come out and say it but do you really think any private sector healthcare company would be able to compete with the national government which has practically unlimited resources in comparison?

    You are right, taxes are for redistribution which I am against. That is why I believe taxes should be as low as possible for EVERYONE. Giving the government more and more of the money we make so they can decided who deserves it and where it should go is socialism.

  6. Website Review: The Right Wing | U.S. Common Sense says:

    January 5th, 2009at 9:57 am(#)

    [...] in their initial post). A decent example of this is their article from October 16th entitled “Obama’s Membership In The Socialist ‘New Party.’” Framing their argument around five different references, they make the case how Obama and the New [...]

  7. Nomination Controversy :: The Right Wing says:

    January 15th, 2009at 12:16 pm(#)

    [...] name and biography.  All in all this isn’t surprising considering Obama’s own membership in a Socialist Party during his time in Illinois that everybody ignored during the election, so why [...]

Leave a Response

CommentLuv Enabled

Poll

What is your favorite news website?
View Results

Right Wing Video

Categories